Author: Anu Heda

Golden Gate. Marketing a different perspective.

Two common traits of the industry’s most effective channel marketing teams

In Naissance’s six-plus years, we’ve observed dozens of and occasionally been integrated into Marketing organizations. Integrating Mike & I into a team is the most flattering of client actions. Essentially our project sponsor is saying: I trust you enough to include you into my organization to make it better.

So through all these projects, I’ve observed two traits common to effective channel teams. These traits may not be universally applicable but they go beyond ideas like “hire smart”, “build a culture”, and “foster hard work.” By channel, we mean teams focused on the marketing needs of institutional, intermediary, direct, and occasionally DC audiences.

Trait 1 – Built foremost for efficiency. Effective channel teams accomplish tasks thoroughly and quickly. Rather than opine on roles, responsibilities, and organizational issues, or allocate time to big strategic challenges, they move quickly from problem identification to marketing requirements and into execution. In the intermediary channel, these tasks may include adding data points to fact sheets. Within institutional, effective teams quickly address issues such as updating RFP content. While there are times for more strategic analysis or introspective review, those times are far fewer than distribution organizations’ needs for efficiency.

Trait 2 – Optimized to continuously learn. Few teams allocate the time and resources to maintain collective, or tribal, knowledge. Many times, as the members of channel marketing teams turn over, past successes and failures are forgotten and thus (failures) often repeated. But the highly effective teams plan to maintain knowledge at an initiative level. This leads to high productivity and extremely effective interactions with Sales partners.

For example, imagine a new Head of Retail Sales joining a distribution team from another asset manager. She has a strong preference for fact sheets to contain a maximum number of portfolio characteristics and have a wholly different design. This could become a massive effort for a retail channel marketing team. A continuously-learning team can share from previous fact sheet renovation efforts with learnings that may showcase data refuting any benefit derived from those changes. In our experience, very few teams build in processes and tools to maintain and use initiative-level learnings. And to assume this will occur organically is naïve.

So as we enter the 2017 planning session (scary how quickly the year’s passing by), considering these traits may positively impact channel teams and the broader Marketing organization.

Best Blogs of the Week #242

Four interesting posts this week highlighted by a game theory discussion via William Blair.

Franklin TempletonSpotlight on Brazil– Once political stability is restored, tackling much needed structural reforms should be a priority, in our view.

Van EckQuality Can Be Rewarding in Emerging Markets Bonds – Overall, investors who maintained exposure to investment grade emerging markets sovereign bonds, with an allocation to BB-rated bonds or 20%, would have earned 7.55% over the past ten years versus 7.83% on the broader emerging markets sovereign index, with lower volatility and higher risk-adjusted returns as measured by the Sharpe ratio.

VanguardDo ETFs make the value of the underlying securities more expensive?–  … strong or weak flows into certain ETFs or categories do not inflate or deflate prices any more than mutual fund flows or the collective purchases of individual investors into stocks like Apple or Facebook. Rather, ETFs reflect the valuation of the underlying securities they are composed of, which is driven by the collective wisdom of all market participants.

William BlairDimensions of Influence Drive Game Theory Analysis – What does this have to do with investing? Game theory provides a way for us to better organize and process the vast amount of information that affects global economies and markets.

the 5-factor spider graph; a Mike McLaughlin favorite

 

Our Input into the 2016 Digital Virtual Council Roundtable

Last month, I participated in the MFEA‘s digital council virtual roundtable with 20+ industry attendees. I shepherded a conversation about blogging throughout the industry. The attendees asked 6 questions related to blogging and I thought to mention two here.

Question 1Should asset manager’s have multiple blogs (by channel or theme)? No, asset managers should have a single, well-executed blog (exceptions arising from situations such as having a very different businesses like recordkeeping or fund-of-fund manager selection). Most of our clients find maintaining a single blog difficult; a second blog would quadruple the difficulty. With a second blog, Marketing teams would need to reconcile author affiliation, brand delineation, and other strategic issues.

Question 2What’s missing in most industry blog posts? Most posts miss a “bottom line” or “key points” that are highly valuable to a scanning FA or institutional investor.

If you have specific questions, let me know and I’ll be happy to share the presentation and background data.

 

Roundtable

Best Blogs of the Week #240

Only a single post this week worth mentioning and more in format than content. American Century revisited macroeconomic themes in a straightforward manner. Revisiting themes or an outlook is done too irregularly. Yet, I think it’s a valuable way to tie thoughts together for an advisor seeking to insights over a medium or long-term.

American CenturyFour Key Themes Revisited – This recalls our discussion of several issues ago about four key economic developments likely to influence large-cap growth stocks in the coming years. Here we revisit these themes in light of events so far in 2016, though we emphasize that our investment philosophy and security selection process remain unchanged.

which way?

Best Blogs of the Week #239

Only one pure best post this week and it touches on the recent fixed income news from Germany.

M & GWhy do people buy negative yielding bonds? – The possibility of selling the asset to someone else at a higher price (a greater fool) is predicated on hoping that having accepted a guaranteed loss of over 50 cents over the course of 10 years, someone else will be willing to accept an even greater guaranteed loss over a shorter time period at some stage in the next 10 years.

M & G Blog Post

There have numerous posts related to post-BREXIT. Without summarizing all of them, here are the two I found compelling.