Best Blogs of the Week
Two blogs made this week’s round-up – one for instruction and the other for helpful information.
Two blogs made this week’s round-up – one for instruction and the other for helpful information.
Slim pickings this week. Here are two posts that look at QE3 and end with similar conclusions.
Three posts this week that do not touch on QE3 since Mike addressed the topic nicely on Friday.
A guy walks into my favorite Manhattan coffee shop and demands an iced espresso with hot milk poured directly into the plastic iced-beverage cup. The cashier, very politely, declines. She says they don’t make a drink like that. As an alternative he can have hot espresso poured into cold milk in a plastic cup.
He smirks and says something unpleasant to her. She asks the barista/manager to help. He comes over and tells him that the cup will melt a bit, also the milk will taste terrible. “We won’t make that,” says the barista.
The patron goes on to throw an adult fit (you know the act – talking to all three baristas at once, saying things under his breath, etc.). Finally he drops the classic line: “why won’t you give the customer what he wants?”
Creating a sense of closure, the manager looks at him and says, “What you’re asking for isn’t safe and it is not a correctly made coffee.”
Observing this interaction made me think about what a customer “wants” versus what is “safe.” There’s a parallel for financial advisors here.
For advisors with a fiduciary duty, they can talk an insistent client down with the “this isn’t a safe investment for you.” But for the remaining advisors with only a suitability requirement, what do they do? It must be a tricky situation. Asset managers could assist.
Asset managers who survey investors could add this topic into the survey. From Natixis to Fidelity (just one of many instances), many asset managers survey investors frequently. Consider questions such as:
Insights from these surveys help advisors during those discussions with examples and data they may not have access to. Surveyed effectively, there may be areas to support this topic in the client on-boarding process. Topics like this are rarely covered but may be fertile ground to support online practice management modules and wholesaler support material.
Mike and I completed our longest engagement last month. In the engagement, we supported developing a firm’s marketing strategy, including a new tagline. As we’ve helped many firms with this endeavor I thought to share one takeaway.
I recommend selecting a single important theme to use throughout a tagline and introductory materials (i.e., one pagers, Web site homepages, etc.). Instead of trying to include numerous topics, such as “global,” “long-term,” “innovative,” and “client-centric.” Select the single most important topic (From our experience, selecting criteria to select the most important topic is difficult in its own right.). The tagline and introduction will be sharper and more likely to stick in a prospect’s head. During secondary interactions (Web site, follow-up meetings, etc.) you can introduce additional themes. And not including the others will not mean your firm isn’t those things.
For instance, a hypothetical quant shop with 15 math and physics PhDs on the team may focus on data analysis. If a prospect leaves an in-person introduction, glances over a whitepaper, or scans a Web site and concludes those guys are serious about data analysis, then that is a much better outcome than concluding those guys are investment managers.