Author: Anu Heda

Best Blogs of the Week #246

Three posts this week to consider, including an interesting retirement income approach via Vanguard.

Hollie Retirement IncomeBlackRockHow investment advisors are changing with the times – How investment advisors are changing with the times – Last year, almost 20% of the surveyed viewed robo advice as a threat to their businesses, while 39% saw robo technology as an opportunity. This year’s study was significantly more optimistic: Only 14% saw robos as a threat, while nearly half saw them as an opportunity.

Chip Retirement IncomeVanguardChanges to Form 5500: Lessons from the life of a beta fish  – Benchmarking often leads to plan design enhancements that improve participant retirement outcomes. Of course, transparency into any individual plan could also produce an entirely different outcome. For example, the proposal indicates that the IRS and DOL could use the Form 5500 data for targeted enforcement of plans with compliance issues noted on the form. It wouldn’t be surprising for these plans to be subject to future audits.

Colleen Retirement IncomeVanguardSustaining retirement income in a lower-return world – Two of the most popular are the “dollar plus inflation” and the “percentage of portfolio” rules. I’d like to offer what I consider an alternate solution: the “dynamic spending” strategy.

 

Measuring Twitter Velocity

An additional way to examine industry Twitter usage is through a velocity test. To measure velocity, I examined the number of days firms need to post 20 tweets (unique content, not retweets or likes). I did this in September of 2015 and again last month. I found one point very interesting: in a small sample, there are not easily identifiable trends associated to specific firms (i.e., firm X always tweets the most).

Naissance TwitterNaissance Twitter

Additionally, the sort rank for velocity changed dramatically. In 2015, BlackRock (3 days), PIMCO (4), and UBS (4) required the fewest days while AB (34) required the most. In 2016, PIMCO (3) increased velocity by 1 day, while the next two firms Goldman Sachs (5) and Natixis (7) stayed in similar velocity. The remaining firms slowed down a bit. The slowest 2016 firm, Voya (27), needed considerably less time than AB in 2015.

 

As social media adoption and usage evolves through its nascent stages for the asset management industry, I’d wager that a velocity test each month would result in differing sort ranks each time.

 

Twitter by the Numbers

In 2016, there are very few, nearing zero, asset managers without a Twitter account. We follow over 100 asset managers and similar to most users we scan through their tweets at idle moments and occasionally click-through to interesting topics. Given the prevalence and long-standing presence (7+ years in some cases) of Twitter across the industry, a basic question comes to mind: are firms gaining larger Twitter followings? I’ve studied a small set of firms over the last year and arrived at three takeaways. But first, the data.

Twitter Data

For instance, MFS increased daily tweets by 80% and saw a 66% positive change in followers.

Takeaways from this analysis:

  1. Nobody has fewer followers than last year, supporting the notion that Twitter (and perhaps all social media tools) has become more valuable for asset managers. Even the three firms that tweet less than they did a year ago have increased followership.
  2. The industry has not settled on a “normal” amount of activity. Different firms are experimenting with volume ranging from every other day (Deutsche Asset and Wealth Management at 0.6 tweets per day) to every four hours (PIMCO at 6.3).
  3. In this 13-firm sample, there’s weak correlation between increased activity (via daily tweets) and increased followership. We have no clustering around the trend line.

Note: PIMCO was excluded from the chart for scaling purposes. PIMCO increased Twitter activity by 1,475% and experienced 12% growth in followers.

Examining Industry Web Site Log-In and Registration

We’re frequently asked for an opinion on financial advisor site authentication. In turn, we often ask if any content absolutely requires a log-in. FAs do not like to register and maintain an additional ID/Password, so securing as little content as possible is a sound initial mindset.

Yet, we understand that broker-dealer only materials require authentication. So what are today’s industry log-in and registration options? I examined how 19 firms enable advisors access to secure content and found two interesting conclusions.

Log-In / Authentication

Of the 19 firms, 8 firms try to authenticate the FA through an e-mail match against the firm’s CRM. Eaton Vance showcases that approach; when the FA tries to access secure content, eatonvance.com asks only for an e-mail address (see below). So an advisor with an e-mail already captured in the CRM does not need to register. That means 12 of the remaining firms make log-in harder than necessary for known FAs to access the content they want.

Eaton Vance Registration

Matching first against CRM will become status quo and firms without that capability are digital laggards.

FA Registration

Firms present registration in one of two forms:

  • 6 of 19 firms require a clear affiliation with a broker-dealer, either through a CRD number, dealer number (via Franklin Templeton), or valid broker-dealer e-mail address (via Legg Mason). This is typically a short form registration requiring only 4 or 5 data fields.
  • The 13 remaining firms present a single or multi-step process (via TIAA) that requests typical online registration information with 10 or more data fields, but without a CRD or Dealer number.

In parallel to these two registration approaches, 4 of the 19 firms also allow FAs to bypass on-site registration via social sign up. All four authenticate via LinkedIn and two also allow authentication via Facebook and Google. Royce (example) uses the LinkedIn approach with an “authorize” window popping up for user acknowledgement.

An abbreviated registration form with a required CRD or Dealer number is more straightforward than long-format registration.

Best Blogs of the Week #245

Only one post this week and it covers fiduciary responsibility. “D-O-L,” as our clients refer to the fiduciary responsibility for financial advisors, looms large throughout the industry. The rule is extremely complex and deserves high-quality posts such as this one.

TIAA – Fiduciary Rule’s “Recommendation”: What’s an Advisor to Do? – So if a statement puts an advisor on the recommendation side of the line such that the advisor becomes a fiduciary, what does that entail?